HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　RISE OF THE DUELIST　＞　Dogmatika Nation

Dogmatika Nation →Used Deck

Card Kind	Attribute	Level	Type	ATK	DEF

Field Spell	-	-	-	-	-
Neither player can target "Dogmatika" monsters you control with effects of monsters that were Special Summoned from the Extra Deck. You can only use each of the following effects of "Dogmatika Nation" once per turn. ●After damage calculation, if your "Dogmatika" monster battled an opponent's monster: Destroy that opponent's monster. ●If this face-up card in the Field Zone is destroyed by an opponent's card effect: You can have each player send 1 monster from their Extra Deck to the GY.
Average Rating Score		6.3(9)

Card Info
Card Reviews (9 rating scores)
Decks with Dogmatika Nation (8 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Dogmatika Nation" card reviews and rating scores

6.3(9)

		0%	（0）
		33%	（3）
		66%	（6）
		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）

アネデパミ
2022/03/01 13:05

Field Spell with the usual theme-only search... not
All of them are decent harassment effects, but they don't have the effect of directly interfering with the opponent, so if you ask me if I should use them, I'm puzzled.
If you remove some of the harassment effects and add a search effect instead, it would probably be used without any complaints.
search is great

Good

アルバ
2020/11/09 20:51

The first effect is that he gives Dogmatika target resistance to extra monsters, and combined with the battle destruction resistance that he sometimes has, he can become stronger against extras, but I wonder if Dogmatika itself has that kind of resistance. A subtle story if you ask me.
The effect of 2 is not bad if you can destroy the opponent you fought, but it has the protection of Fruldris, and if anything, it also has Theo, so it is relatively strong in battle and does not engage so much.
The effect of 3 must be destroyed by the opponent, and the opponent can also send it to his GY.
Therefore, it is designed to feel fear when the opponent comes to destroy it.
I'm not writing anything bad, but I can't deny that he's currently going in the opposite direction of Dogmatika.

Good

TK
2020/07/24 20:39

Well, as a normal field, it's strong.
The EX drop effect of 3 is exceptional after all
Dropping from EX is really rare and powerful
But it doesn't matter because Dogmatika can easily use that exceptional effect with other cards.
If you use Dogmatika, you can do the same thing as many times as you want, so you don't need it
If you shoot this against your opponent, ah, it's still better with just one card.

Good ( 1 )

備長炭18
2020/07/22 21:43

Dogmatika's Field Spell, which has a lot of combat resistance, and his Dogmatika has synergies with target resistance and post-combat removal. Against a somewhat passive effect, his EX 1 GY Fertilizer when directly removed also functions as a care since Nutos is there.
However, in a theme that tends to prioritize cards that can actively move with high search and deployment power and excellent removal due to it, it can not be removed without fighting, and GY Fertilizer also has a lower priority if it depends on the opponent. In some cases, one wheel or village is often prioritized.
When I go on a business trip to other themes, I can only crush the frame, and if I adopt it, I think that pure construction is suitable.

Good ( 1 )

とき
2020/05/03 0:17

On the other hand, when a Field Spell like this Field Spell comes, he feels uncomfortable.
Give Dogmatika resistance to effects from monsters from the EX Deck and the effect of destroying the opponent who battled, and when destroyed by the opponent's effect, each other has the effect of sending 1 card from the EX Deck to his GY. .
His Dogmatika, which is already strong against monsters that have emerged from EX, is given strong resistance, and combined with the low-level Dogmatika's own battle destruction resistance, he can unilaterally destroy monsters that have emerged from EX.
However, there is a feeling that it is a field that specializes in granting resistance and restraint, including his GY Fertilization of EX that restrains the opponent's destruction. Dogmatika has a lot of power cards, and I have the impression that he doesn't entrust Dogmatika that much in combat, so I can't say anything about the position of this card. If you want to build a pure Dogmatika?

Good ( 1 )

プンプン丸
2020/04/23 11:56

Dogmatika Field Spell Like Anor Londo?
Since EX monsters are a monster army that cannot be destroyed by battle,
It is quite strong because it can be made even harder by ①. But even if he doesn't have a Field Spell, if he has [Majespecter], it's already built-in! !
(2) Unrelated to the monsters that came out of EX casually, you can destroy the opponent's monsters by force, which is a plain obnoxious effect.
③ If you send insurance and bastard to her GY, it will indirectly lead to search.
Overall, I think it's a good card that supports Dogmatika in a nice way. In the first place, it's crazy to search for Field Spells, so this is just right.

Good

シエスタ
2020/04/23 11:02

It's literally a field of Dogmatika, but it's written only about subtle things.
Dogmatika has a card that can demonstrate battle resistance against EX monsters, so I think it has some restraint power. There are many holes.
I think it's difficult to give priority to this in this day and age unless it's an effect that can get even one ad instantly.

Good ( 1 )

exa
2020/04/18 8:01

With pure Dogmatika, it is difficult to remove monsters without going through the monsters in the Extra Deck that are dropped by 《Dogmatika Maximus》, or by using 《Dogmatika Punishment》, which has card power but is a Trap and is one step behind. This card can be searched from Ecclesia and has a removal effect with (2), so it can be said that inserting one will increase your ability to respond.
That said, (2) is a one-time-per-turn effect, and it's also a self-destruct attack/damage preparation, so it's also true that it's hard to gain an advantage with this card. It is an impression that it is not necessary to put in a large amount.

Good

2022/05/10 14:05

I think what you have written is strong.
However, the drawback is that you can't interfere with the opponent's deployment.
My pure Dogmatika Deck has Secret Village of the Spellcasters mixed in.
It depends on the opponent, but if you set up Sato and Midrash
Because it boasts a considerable locking performance
Why not try it?
(in use at MD)

Good